You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 1, January 1, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improving Reports of Studies of Diagnostic Tests

The STARD Initiative

Drummond Rennie, MD

JAMA. 2003;289:89-90.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Authors preparing reports for THE JOURNAL on the accuracy of diagnostic tests will notice a change in our Instructions for Authors.1 They will be referred to a checklist and flow diagram for a study of diagnostic accuracy on the JAMA Web site (http://www.jama.com) and to a statement about this checklist and flow diagram,2 as well as a background document,3 both of which are being published simultaneously in Clinical Chemistry and are available without charge at http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/49/1/1 and http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/49/1/7. A statement will also be published in other journals in laboratory medicine, as well as in Radiology, another journal that often publishes evaluations of tests, and it is free from copyright restrictions. Those desiring to do so may publish and use it freely.

In 1999, JAMA published a report by Lijmer et al4 that drew attention to the poor state of such reporting, many such . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Dr Rennie is Deputy Editor, JAMA.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prognosis in isolated gastroschisis with bowel dilatation: a systematic review
Tower et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94:F268-F274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

True or not: uncertainty of laboratory results
Viljoen and Twomey
J. Clin. Pathol. 2007;60:587-588.
FULL TEXT  

Accuracy of pulse oximetry in screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns: a systematic review
Thangaratinam et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007;92:F176-F180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interpreting the Medical Literature
Satya-Murti
JAMA 2006;296:1410-1411.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.