This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: In response to Dr Ahmed and colleagues, it is important to note that, when generating the propensity scores on which patients were matched, we chose as the outcome measure in the logistic regression whether or not a patient was transfused, and we therefore selected variables that might be related to that event. We were not selecting variables that were predictors of mortality. The propensity score was used to remove, or to some extent control for, confounding and selection biases for transfusion. The propensity score for transfusion was determined without regard to mortality. Variables were not weighted in any manner. Logistic regression yields a predicted probability of group membership (in our case, transfused and nontransfused) based on the best combination of predictors. More detailed explanations of propensity scoring and its application in observational studies can be found elsewhere.^1-3

Regarding the representativeness of the matched patients with the total number . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RELATED ARTICLES

Blood Transfusions and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients
Keyvan Karkouti, W. Scott Beattie, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, and Stuart A. McCluskey
JAMA. 2003;289(10):1242.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blood Transfusions and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients
Saif S. Rathore and Harlan M. Krumholz
JAMA. 2003;289(10):1242.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blood Transfusions and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients
Syed Ahmed, Yizhak Kupfer, and Sidney Tessler
JAMA. 2003;289(10):1242-1243.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT