You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 16, April 23, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Hypertension
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The ALLHAT authors1 do not comment on the curious finding that patients who received chlorthalidone were twice as likely as those assigned to amlodipine to die of unintentional injury, suicide, or homicide. Although the absolute difference in the risk (0.3 persons per 6-year per 100 persons) was small, it did reach statistical significance. The difference in the rate between chlorthalidone and lisinopril was in the same direction but did not reach statistical significance.

Although acknowledging that this end point was not prespecified, it nonetheless brings to mind the similar finding that patients treated with statins were at higher risk for suicide and violent behavior.2 After further analysis, it seems that those associations were not causal in nature.3

Without wishing to detract from the evidence that initial use of a thiazide diuretic resulted in similar overall morality outcomes and indeed superior results in other outcomes, this intriguing finding . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLES

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Taishiro Chikamori
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2066.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Jan Laws Houghton
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2066.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Christopher R. Palmer, Morris J. Brown, Giuseppe Mancia, and Luis M. Ruilope
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2066-2067.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Franz H. Messerli and Michael A. Weber
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2067-2068.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
H. T. Ong
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2068.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Steven A. Yarows
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2068-2069.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors—Reply
Jackson T. Wright, Jr, Barry R. Davis, and Jeffrey A. Cutler
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2069-2070.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981-2997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.