You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 16, April 23, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Hypertension
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Chikamori suggests that the high prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and baseline left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may be responsible for the difference in heart failure between the chlorthalidone and both the lisinopril and amlodipine arms of ALLHAT. The prevalence of atherosclerotic disease (52%) observed in ALLHAT, although higher than in the trials he indicates, was less than that in the The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators (HOPE) trial (80%).1 Assessment of LV function was not required at baseline in ALLHAT. However, hypertensive patients with a history of heart failure or measured LV ejection fraction of less than 35% were excluded from the trial.

Dr Houghton's hypothesis that the conclusions from ALLHAT may relate only to those with salt-sensitive hypertension is interesting, although not directly evaluated in our study. Diuretic-based therapy has demonstrated benefit in multiple subgroups of patients.2 In fact, the largest body of evidence in . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLES

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Taishiro Chikamori
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2066.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Jan Laws Houghton
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2066.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Christopher R. Palmer, Morris J. Brown, Giuseppe Mancia, and Luis M. Ruilope
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2066-2067.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Franz H. Messerli and Michael A. Weber
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2067-2068.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
William Rifkin
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2068.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
H. T. Ong
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2068.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Cardiovascular Consequences of Diuretics vs Calcium Channel Blockers vs Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Steven A. Yarows
JAMA. 2003;289(16):2068-2069.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Information from drug companies and opinion leaders
Liberati and Magrini
BMJ 2003;326:1156-1157.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.