This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Primary Care/ Family Medicine  • Violence and Human Rights  • Violence and Human Rights, Other  • Women's Health  • Women's Health, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: We agree with Dr Finucane that the avoidance of harm should remain a primary goal of medical care in violence against women. This is precisely why there is a need for high-quality studies to determine which interventions actually are helpful for women who are experiencing violence or abuse in their lives.^1-2 However, for women presenting to a primary care physician, the standard is not just research evidence, but the outcome of the clinical encounter itself. If women are not given the opportunity to disclose exposure to violence it may lead to misdiagnosis and a path of inappropriate investigations or treatments that do not address the underlying problem.³ Furthermore, studies find that both abused and nonabused women patients appreciate being asked about abuse.⁴ Qualitative studies find that abused patients may interpret a failure to ask (or acceptance of unconvincing excuses) as proof that the physician does not wish to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Intervening in Abusive Relationships
Thomas E. Finucane
JAMA. 2003;289(17):2211.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Domestic Violence Screening Helpful?
Thomas B. Cole
JAMA. 2000;284(5):551-553.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT