You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 18, May 14, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Conflict of Interest
 •Medical Education
 •Medical Ethics
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Defending Professional Independence

ACCME's Proposed New Guidelines for Commercial Support of CME

Arnold S. Relman, MD

JAMA. 2003;289:2418-2420.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

On January 14 of this year, the Accreditation Council on Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) released a draft of proposed new and stronger standards for the commercial support of continuing medical education (CME)1 and requested comments from the medical community. The following month, the Washington Legal Foundation (WLF), a legal think tank, issued a highly critical commentary,2 in which it recommended that the ACCME withdraw its proposals because they were unnecessary, counterproductive, and possibly even illegal. Both the proposed new ACCME standards and the WLF critique raise issues of the greatest importance to our profession with respect to the growing intrusion of the pharmaceutical companies into medical education. These issues need to be discussed and clearly understood before the ACCME issues its final guidelines.

Two years ago I argued that our profession had made a serious mistake in the way it has allowed pharmaceutical companies to participate . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Industry Sponsorship of Continuing Medical Education
Kurt J. Boyce, Jacqueline Parochka, and Karen Overstreet
JAMA. 2003;290(9):1149.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Sponsorship of Continuing Medical Education
Jack E. Angel
JAMA. 2003;290(9):1149-1150.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Industry Sponsorship of Continuing Medical Education
Joel E. Cleary
JAMA. 2003;290(9):1150.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Industry Support of Medical Education
Relman
JAMA 2008;300:1071-1073.
FULL TEXT  

A Historical Perspective of Pharmaceutical Promotion and Physician Education
Podolsky and Greene
JAMA 2008;300:831-833.
FULL TEXT  

Conflict of Interest in Clinical Practice
Tonelli
Chest 2007;132:664-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimizing Outcomes in Psychopharmacology Continuing Medical Education (CME): Measuring Learning and Attitudes That May Predict Knowledge Translation into Clinical Practice
Stahl et al.
Focus 2006;4:487.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Narrative Review: The Promotion of Gabapentin: An Analysis of Internal Industry Documents
Steinman et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:284-293.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Financial Disclosures of Scientific Papers Presented at the 2003 RSNA Annual Meeting: Association with Reporting of Non-Food and Drug Administration-approved Uses of Industry Products
Brown et al.
Radiology 2006;239:849-855.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Status of Medical Grand Rounds in Departments of Medicine at US Medical Schools
Mueller et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:313-321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Financial Conflicts of Interest in Physicians' Relationships with the Pharmaceutical Industry -- Self-Regulation in the Shadow of Federal Prosecution
Studdert et al.
NEJM 2004;351:1891-1900.
FULL TEXT  

CME and the pharmaceutical industry: two worlds, three views, four steps
Davis
CMAJ 2004;171:149-150.
FULL TEXT  

The future sponsorship of CME in Canada: Industry, government, physicians or a blend?
Marlow
CMAJ 2004;171:150-151.
FULL TEXT  

State-mandated continuing medical education and the use of proven therapies in patients with an acute myocardial infarction
Patel et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:192-198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What's wrong with CME?
CMAJ 2004;170:917-917.
FULL TEXT  

Qu'est-ce qui ne va pas avec l'EMC?
CMAJ 2004;170:919-919.
FULL TEXT  

Industry Sponsorship of Continuing Medical Education
Boyce et al.
JAMA 2003;290:1149-1149.
FULL TEXT  

Industry Sponsorship of Continuing Medical Education
Cleary
JAMA 2003;290:1150-1150.
FULL TEXT  

Industry Sponsorship of Continuing Medical Education
Angel
JAMA 2003;290:1149-1150.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.