 |
|
Pulse Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
To the Editor: Dr Domanski and colleagues1 present 2 analyses of the relationship between blood pressure and cardiovascular disease–related mortality. Unfortunately their results are contradictory. The first analysis, which uses linear regression, finds that increasing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and increasing diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are both related to increasing risk of mortality. The second analysis, illustrated by their Figure, is by groupings into strata of blood pressure. This shows a relation in which risk can increase with both low and high DBP. This is inconsistent with a linear relationship implied by the regression analysis. Such an analysis seems to be used only to provide statistical "proof" that both SBP and DBP provides better prediction than either alone. But in their discussion the authors make this point by using the conflicting results from the categorical analysis showing risks can rise with both low and high DBP. The relationships determined by . . . [Full Text of this Article]
RELATED ARTICLES
Pulse Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
Travis S. Hiles and Patrick M. Moriarty
JAMA. 2003;289(2):174-175.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pulse Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
James D. Neaton, Michael Domanski, and Jeremiah Stamler
JAMA. 2003;289(2):175.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pulse Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease–Related Mortality: Follow-up Study of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT)
Michael Domanski, Gary Mitchell, Marc Pfeffer, James D. Neaton, James Norman, Kenneth Svendsen, Richard Grimm, Jerome Cohen, Jeremiah Stamler, and for the MRFIT Research Group
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2677-2683.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
