You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 21, June 4, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Jones and colleagues1 suggested several guidelines for maintaining the reliability of office blood pressure (BP) measurement. Even the most accurate office measurements, however, may not necessarily represent the patient's BP during daily life. Repeated readings taken in the patient's usual environment may be more useful than those taken in the physician's office for diagnosing hypertension and for adjusting therapy.2-3 We agree with Jones et al that the accuracy of such automated measurements must be ensured.

The most widely used protocols for validating automated monitors are those of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Administration (AAMI) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS). Under both protocols, validation of a brand of automated monitor involves assessment of only a single monitor unit in 85 individuals, each tested 3 times.4 To pass validation, the mean error across the resulting 255 readings must be no more than 5 mm Hg . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Bernard M. Karnath
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2792.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Albert Fournier and Michel Safar
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Karim Bendjelid
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure—Reply
Daniel W. Jones, Lawrence J. Appel, Sheldon G. Sheps, Edward J. Roccella, and Claude Lenfant
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793-2794.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring Blood Pressure Accurately: New and Persistent Challenges
Daniel W. Jones, Lawrence J. Appel, Sheldon G. Sheps, Edward J. Roccella, and Claude Lenfant
JAMA. 2003;289(8):1027-1030.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.