 |
 |

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Jones and colleagues1 suggested several guidelines for maintaining the reliability of office blood pressure (BP) measurement. Even the most accurate office measurements, however, may not necessarily represent the patient's BP during daily life. Repeated readings taken in the patient's usual environment may be more useful than those taken in the physician's office for diagnosing hypertension and for adjusting therapy.2-3 We agree with Jones et al that the accuracy of such automated measurements must be ensured.
The most widely used protocols for validating automated monitors are those of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Administration (AAMI) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS). Under both protocols, validation of a brand of automated monitor involves assessment of only a single monitor unit in 85 individuals, each tested 3 times.4 To pass validation, the mean error across the resulting 255 readings must be no more than 5 mm Hg . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Bernard M. Karnath
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2792.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Albert Fournier and Michel Safar
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Karim Bendjelid
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Accurate Measurement of Blood PressureReply
Daniel W. Jones, Lawrence J. Appel, Sheldon G. Sheps, Edward J. Roccella, and Claude Lenfant
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793-2794.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Measuring Blood Pressure Accurately: New and Persistent Challenges
Daniel W. Jones, Lawrence J. Appel, Sheldon G. Sheps, Edward J. Roccella, and Claude Lenfant
JAMA. 2003;289(8):1027-1030.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|