You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 21, June 4, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To The Editor: Dr Jones and colleagues1 highlighted many important sources of error in blood pressure measurement. There are 3 main sources of error: technique, observer bias, and faulty equipment.2 Of all the possible sources of error, only one cannot be overcome through proper training, namely, that of faulty equipment. As Jones et al point out, the mercury sphygmomanometer has been the criterion standard for blood pressure measurement. Nonetheless, concerns about mercury toxicity have led to its recent removal from hospitals and clinics.3 Unlike mercury sphygmomanometers, however, aneroid sphygmomanometers require regular calibration. Much of the reluctance concerning the continued use of mercury devices may have come from broken glass thermometers. Modern mercury sphygmomanometers, on the other hand, are generally safe against accidental spillage.4 With accurate blood pressure measurement an essential part of every clinical visit, I believe that the mercury sphygmomanometer should remain an essential component of every clinical examination . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Amy R. Schwartz, Donald C. Haas, William Gerin, and Thomas G. Pickering
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2792.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Albert Fournier and Michel Safar
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Karim Bendjelid
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure—Reply
Daniel W. Jones, Lawrence J. Appel, Sheldon G. Sheps, Edward J. Roccella, and Claude Lenfant
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793-2794.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring Blood Pressure Accurately: New and Persistent Challenges
Daniel W. Jones, Lawrence J. Appel, Sheldon G. Sheps, Edward J. Roccella, and Claude Lenfant
JAMA. 2003;289(8):1027-1030.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.