You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 21, June 4, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: The letter from Dr Schwartz and colleagues and their referenced publication on validation protocols adds weight to our concern about current validation protocols. We argued that "[v]alidation standards should be based, in part, on the percentage of individual readings within an accurate range." The findings of Schwartz et al clearly demonstrate the hazards of depending on group means for instrument validation.1

We agree with Dr Karnath that the mercury sphygmomanometer should remain available until other instruments are better validated. As we noted, however, a validated, frequently calibrated, and maintained aneroid instrument is a suitable alternative for those who no longer have access to mercury manometers.

We share the concerns of Drs Fournier and Safar about the use of oscillometric instruments in elderly individuals. We also agree that the use of algorithms to calculate systolic and diastolic blood pressure in those with stiff arteries is challenging and associated with . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Amy R. Schwartz, Donald C. Haas, William Gerin, and Thomas G. Pickering
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2792.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Bernard M. Karnath
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2792.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Albert Fournier and Michel Safar
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accurate Measurement of Blood Pressure
Karim Bendjelid
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2793.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.