You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 21, June 4, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outcomes of Medical vs Invasive Therapy for Elderly Patients With Angina

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Pfisterer and colleagues1 reported that 1 year after either invasive treatment or optimized medical therapy, elderly patients with angina had similar symptoms, quality of life, and risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. In contrast with their previous report of 6-month outcomes,2 the authors now report that patients who underwent medical therapy had a higher risk of later hospitalizations for uncontrolled symptoms. The end point of hospitalization seems reasonable, even though other primary and secondary prevention studies did not use it.3-5 Although this makes the trial less comparable with previous results, the authors did not discuss these differences.

Furthermore, the authors' use of the term "optimized medical therapy" seems questionable. Only 22% of these patients received lipid-lowering drugs, and despite the fact that all had symptomatic coronary artery disease, 23% had diabetes and 45% had hypercholesterolemia. Ideal medical management would include achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Outcomes of Medical vs Invasive Therapy for Elderly Patients With Angina—Reply
Matthias Pfisterer
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2794.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcome of Elderly Patients With Chronic Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease With an Invasive vs Optimized Medical Treatment Strategy: One-Year Results of the Randomized TIME Trial
Matthias Pfisterer, Peter Buser, Stefan Osswald, Urs Allemann, Wolfgang Amann, Walter Angehrn, Eric Eeckhout, Paul Erne, Werner Estlinbaum, Gabriela Kuster, Tiziano Moccetti, Barbara Naegeli, Peter Rickenbacher, and for the Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in Elderly patients Investigators
JAMA. 2003;289(9):1117-1123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.