You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 21, June 4, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Renal Diseases
 •Acute Renal Failure
 •Angiology
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Acetylcysteine and Renal Function Following Coronary Angiographic Procedures

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Kay and colleagues1 found that in patients with moderate renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography, prophylactic use of acetylcysteine with hydration resulted in an 8% absolute risk reduction in the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. Despite promising results from additional similar trials with acetylcysteine,2-3 we are concerned about how the primary end point was defined in this study.

Like other authors,4-5 Kay et al defined contrast-induced nephropathy as a 25% increase in serum creatinine level, a definition that has traditionally been used as a surrogate end point for reduction in kidney function. It is unclear, however, whether this reflects other clinically important end points such as need for dialysis, length of hospitalization, or mortality.6 The study by Kay et al was not designed to detect these as primary outcomes, despite the finding of a half-day reduction in length of hospitalization and that no patient required dialysis. Therefore, we . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Theophylline for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Bagshaw and Ghali
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1087-1093.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.