You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 23, June 18, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Devereaux and colleagues1 acknowledged the ongoing debate in Canada about the optimal mix of private and public funding of health care expenses. However, we disagree with their characterization of this debate as between private for-profit and private not-for-profit entities. In fact, the majority of hospital-based care in Canada, including nearly all dialysis, occurs in public not-for-profit institutions. While nominally independent, Canadian hospitals generally receive almost all their funding from provincial governments and are administered by boards that must answer to them.2 In our opinion these hospitals function as public institutions.

The comparison of private not-for-profit and private for-profit dialysis clinics is thus of limited relevance to countries such as Canada, where dialysis is mainly provided by public hospitals. While we do not advocate a shift to US-style private for-profit dialysis, we think it is unfortunate that the conclusions of Devereaux et al do not reflect the . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Juan Bosch, Raymond M. Hakim, J. Michael Lazarus, and Charles J. McAllister
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3087-3088.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
John S. Lyons
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3088.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, Rajnish Mehrotra, and Joel D. Kopple
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3089.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers—Reply
P. J. Devereaux, Holger J. Schünemann, Deborah J. Cook, Mohit Bhandari, Nikila Ravindran, Brydon J. B. Grant, Christina Lacchetti, John N. Lavis, David R. S. Haslam, Ted Haines, Terrence Sullivan, and Gordon H. Guyatt
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3089-3090.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Mortality Between Private For-Profit and Private Not-For-Profit Hemodialysis Centers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
P. J. Devereaux, Holger J. Schünemann, Nikila Ravindran, Mohit Bhandari, Amit X. Garg, Peter T.-L. Choi, Brydon J. B. Grant, Ted Haines, Christina Lacchetti, Bruce Weaver, John N. Lavis, Deborah J. Cook, David R. S. Haslam, Terrence Sullivan, and Gordon H. Guyatt
JAMA. 2002;288(19):2449-2457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.