 |
 |

Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis CentersReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Dr Bosch and colleagues suggest that we have selected studies based on their results. As we clearly stated, however, we established explicit eligibility criteria and blacked out all study results prior to determining study eligibility so that we were unable to select or reject an article based on the study results. Articles for inclusion in a systematic review are selected on the basis of meeting prespecified methodological criteria, not on the basis of where they are published. Doctoral dissertations undergo peer review that is as rigorous, if not more rigorous, than that for articles published in medical journals.
Bosch et al also suggest that Irvin's study1 found only a "small . . . higher probability of dying in a for-profit dialysis unit." Patients and many clinicians are likely to think that an increase of as much as 7% in their relative risk of dying, suggested by the data . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Juan Bosch, Raymond M. Hakim, J. Michael Lazarus, and Charles J. McAllister
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3087-3088.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
John S. Lyons
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3088.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Peter G. Blake and David C. Mendelssohn
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3088-3089.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Care in Profit vs Not-For-Profit Dialysis Centers
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh, Rajnish Mehrotra, and Joel D. Kopple
JAMA. 2003;289(23):3089.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|