You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 3, January 15, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Cincinnati Radiation Tests

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Stephens claims that I have misrepresented her book and made factual errors in my review. I did not claim that the book "lacks" or is devoid of a description or analysis of the Cincinnati radiation study. What I said was that I "expected a thorough description and analysis of the Cincinnati study and a balanced presentation of the issues." For instance, appendix I provides minimal technical information about the study subjects. Stephens describes the cancers by anatomic site only, without information about diagnosis and staging. A systematic analysis of informed consent, ie, what the subjects were told and not told, was not provided. Stephens also limits the discussion to a selected group of patients; about two thirds of the study group is not discussed at all.

In retrospect, I should have included discussion of the lawsuit and Judge Sandra Beckwith's opinion. However, the additional material would not . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Cincinnati Radiation Tests
Martha Stephens
JAMA. 2003;289(3):301-302.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acute Purulent Sinusitis Triggered by Topical Nasal Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition
Lundberg
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;172:512-513.
FULL TEXT  

ATS/ERS Recommendations for Standardized Procedures for the Online and Offline Measurement of Exhaled Lower Respiratory Nitric Oxide and Nasal Nitric Oxide, 2005
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;171:912-930.
FULL TEXT  

Multiple Single-breath Measurements of Nitric Oxide in the Intubated Patient
Tornberg et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003;168:1210-1215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of nasal and sinus nitric oxide output using single-breath humming exhalations
Maniscalco et al.
Eur Respir J 2003;22:323-329.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.