You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 3, January 15, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medicare Quality Improvement

Bad Apples or Bad Systems?

David C. Hsia, JD, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2003;289:354-356.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The Quality Improvement Group at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services leads the quality improvement organizations (QIOs, formerly the PROs [peer review organizations], PSROs [professional standards review organizations], EMCROs [experimental medical care review organizations], etc),1 and according to the results of a study by Jencks and colleagues2 in this issue of THE JOURNAL, their leadership is effective. No other US organization measures quality at the hospital level. The QIO program uses 24 quality indicators that have strong evidence to support them. Jencks et al report that between 1999 and 2001, the proportion of Medicare patients receiving appropriate care improved from 70% to 73% on average, although this rate varied widely across states and by indicator.2 Their analysis is valid, robust, understandable, and correct. For the 1999-2002 QIO contract cycle, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services required all QIOs to improve quality in 5 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Md.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Can Administrative Data Assess Physicians' Quality of Care?
Marcy Zwelling-Aamot
JAMA. 2003;289(20):2648.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Change in the Quality of Care Delivered to Medicare Beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001
Stephen F. Jencks, Edwin D. Huff, and Timothy Cuerdon
JAMA. 2003;289(3):305-312.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Beyond The Efficiency Index: Finding A Better Way To Reduce Overuse And Increase Efficiency In Physician Care
Greene et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:w250-w259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Continuous Quality Improvement to Increase Use of Process Measures in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ferguson et al.
JAMA 2003;290:49-56.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care
Satya-Murti
JAMA 2003;290:119-120.
FULL TEXT  

Can Administrative Data Assess Physicians' Quality of Care?
Zwelling-Aamot
JAMA 2003;289:2648-2648.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.