You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 4, January 22, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Rehabilitation Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In his Editorial1 that accompanied the study by Gerritsen et al,2 Dr Wilgis suggested that surgery should be preferred to wrist splinting. He did not mention other treatment modalities. In February 2002, the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of an 830-nm gallium aluminum arsenide laser for treatment of CTS based on experimental data,3 which confirm prior results.4 Naeser et al,5 in a placebo-controlled trial, applied laser light to acupuncture points in conjunction with transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, resulting in an 88% decrease in neuropathic pain and improved sensory nerve conduction. The concomitant benefit of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation suggests that other energy modalities on the electromagnetic spectrum may also be effective. Finally, a colleague and I reported that the constant wearing of static, permanent, multipolar magnetic wrist devices for 1 month produced significant reduction of neuropathic pain in refractory cases (57%) and distal motor latencies . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Margit L. Bleecker
JAMA. 2003;289(4):420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Ernest W. Johnson
JAMA. 2003;289(4):420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Daniel L. Menkes
JAMA. 2003;289(4):420-421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Benjamin M. Sucher
JAMA. 2003;289(4):421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Andrea Klauser and Michael Schirmer
JAMA. 2003;289(4):421.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Annette A. M. Gerritsen, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Rob J. P. M. Scholten, Frits W. Bertelsmann, Marc C. T. F. M. de Krom, and Lex M. Bouter
JAMA. 2003;289(4):421-422.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
E. F. Shaw Wilgis
JAMA. 2003;289(4):422-423.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Splinting vs Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Annette A. M. Gerritsen, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Rob J. P. M. Scholten, Frits W. Bertelsmann, Marc C. T. F. M. de Krom, and Lex M. Bouter
JAMA. 2002;288(10):1245-1251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment Options for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
E. F. Shaw Wilgis
JAMA. 2002;288(10):1281-1282.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.