You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 289 No. 6, February 12, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Losartan vs Atenolol in Prevention of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In emphasizing the benefits of losartan on stroke reduction, Dr Kjeldsen and colleagues1 state that "Previous intervention studies in ISH with diuretic or {beta}-blocker or calcium antagonists or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have shown 36%, 42%, and 38% reductions in stroke vs placebo. A further 40% reduction in stroke with losartan-based therapy . . . is an important finding. . . . " The authors imply that a reduction in strokes in the order of magnitude of 80% would have been achieved had losartan been compared with placebo instead of atenolol. In the 3 studies the authors use to compute these estimates, antihypertensive therapy against placebo was either based on diuretics (in the SHEP trial) or calcium antagonists (in the Syst-Eur and Syst-China trials), and no data were given on {beta}-blockers or ACE inhibitors. In the SHEP study, atenolol, when added to diuretic therapy in some patients, did . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Losartan vs Atenolol in Prevention of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease
Albert Fournier, Roxana Oprisiu, Michel Andrejak, Leonardo Fernandez, and Jean Michel Achard
JAMA. 2003;289(6):700.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Losartan vs Atenolol in Prevention of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease
Sverre E. Kjeldsen
JAMA. 2003;289(6):701.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Losartan on Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Isolated Systolic Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: A Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction (LIFE) Substudy
Sverre E. Kjeldsen, Björn Dahlöf, Richard B. Devereux, Stevo Julius, Peter Aurup, Jonathan Edelman, Gareth Beevers, Ulf de Faire, Frej Fyhrquist, Hans Ibsen, Krister Kristianson, Ole Lederballe-Pedersen, Lars H. Lindholm, Markku S. Nieminen, Per Omvik, Suzanne Oparil, Steven Snapinn, Hans Wedel, and for the LIFE Study Group
JAMA. 2002;288(12):1491-1498.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are {beta}-Blockers Efficacious as First-line Therapy for Hypertension in the Elderly?: A Systematic Review
Franz H. Messerli, Ehud Grossman, and Uri Goldbourt
JAMA. 1998;279(23):1903-1907.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reply
Messerli and Fournier
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2097-2098.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.