 |
 |

Losartan vs Atenolol in Prevention of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: In response to Dr Fournier and colleagues and Dr Messerli and colleagues, we too are uncertain why losartan prevented stroke to such a greater extent than atenolol with the same level of blood pressure reduction, yet why the 2 regimens were equal in preventing myocardial infarction. Although our study did not address mechanisms, there are preclinical data in models such as the stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat that show a benefit of angiotensin AT1-receptor blockade with losartan on cerebrovascular structure and prevention of cerebral lesions in the absence of an effect on blood pressure.1 In this context, AT2-receptor stimulation in addition to AT1-receptor blockade for greater selective cerebral protection seems intriguing.2 In addition, pending results of mechanistic substudies of our study may potentially shed light on the cerebrovascular protective properties of losartan.3
Regarding the choice of the 1-selective blocker atenolol as the comparator, this drug and . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Losartan vs Atenolol in Prevention of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease
Albert Fournier, Roxana Oprisiu, Michel Andrejak, Leonardo Fernandez, and Jean Michel Achard
JAMA. 2003;289(6):700.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Losartan vs Atenolol in Prevention of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease
Franz H. Messerli, Ehud Grossman, and Albert Fournier
JAMA. 2003;289(6):700-701.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981-2997.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|