You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 1, July 2, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Screening Sigmoidoscopy— How Often and How Good?

Robert H. Fletcher, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2003;290:106-108.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Flexible sigmoidoscopy is a member in good standing in the family of screening tests for colorectal cancer. Consistent evidence shows that even a single screening sigmoidoscopy reduces mortality from colorectal cancer by two thirds in the area examined, about half of the large bowel.1-4 All major screening guidelines recommend sigmoidoscopy, often coupled with fecal occult blood testing.5-7 In the United States, more than half of patients appropriately screened have had sigmoidoscopy.8 The cost-effectiveness of screening sigmoidoscopy compares favorably with other recommended screening tests for colorectal cancer9 and with screening for other cancers.

But several questions remain. How often should sigmoidoscopy be repeated in the course of a screening program? Is sigmoidoscopy a good enough option relative to other available tests, such as colonoscopy? How can sigmoidoscopy be made available to all adults who want to be screened in this way?

In this issue of THE . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School/Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Mass.


RELATED LETTER

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy—Reply
Robert E. Schoen and Joel L. Weissfeld
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Results of Repeat Sigmoidoscopy 3 Years After a Negative Examination
Robert E. Schoen, Paul F. Pinsky, Joel L. Weissfeld, Robert S. Bresalier, Timothy Church, Philip Prorok, and John K. Gohagan
JAMA. 2003;290(1):41-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening for Colorectal Neoplasms With New Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Update on Performance Characteristics
Allison et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1462-1470.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy--Reply
Schoen and Weissfeld
JAMA 2003;290:2123-2123.
FULL TEXT  

Incidence of Advanced Adenomas and Distal Cancers After Negative Screening Sigmoidoscopy
JWatch Gastroenterology 2003;2003:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.