You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 11, September 17, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Sharma and colleagues point out that we excluded patients with acute myocardial infarction from our trial, as has been the policy for virtually all broad-based trials of PCI. Ongoing myocardial infarction at the time of enrollment influences both the administration of other antithrombotic agents prior to randomization and the ascertainment of clinical end points, essentially precluding diagnosis of periprocedural myocardial necrosis. For these and other reasons, patients with acute infarction are usually studied in trials specifically dedicated to percutaneous revascularization in that setting. As we noted in our article, "patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable ischemic syndromes requiring empiric Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition were not included in the Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)–2 trial, and the results of this trial should not be interpreted to suggest that Gp IIb/IIIa blockade should be supplanted in those patients." Future studies are planned, however, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

A. Michael Lincoff, MD; Eric J. Topol, MD
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio
for the REPLACE-2 Investigators



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Sanjiv Sharma, William Nyitray, and Brijesh Bhambi
JAMA. 2003;290(11):1451.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early and Sustained Dual Oral Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Steven R. Steinhubl, Peter B. Berger, J. Tift Mann III, Edward T. A. Fry, Augustin DeLago, Charles Wilmer, Eric J. Topol, and for the CREDO Investigators
JAMA. 2002;288(19):2411-2420.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.