You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 12, September 24, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Computed Tomography
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Screening for Coronary Calcification

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr O'Malley and colleagues1 found that receipt of a screening "heart scan" provided neither benefit nor harm to a young, predominantly male military population at low 10-year risk of incident coronary heart disease (CHD).

Nevertheless, I remain concerned about the potential harms of computed tomography (CT) screening for CHD among older populations, particularly when undertaken outside of the context of research protocols. A visual diagnosis of silent CHD could have adverse mental health consequences in older patients who seek testing to allay fears of myocardial infarction and sudden death.

Moreover, outside of research protocols, follow-up evaluation of older individuals will frequently devolve to physicians with little experience interpreting calcium scores. Unaware of the high prevalence of coronary calcium in older populations,2 many physicians may refer older patients with detectable coronary calcium for stress testing, which would likely have a low positive predictive value in asymptomatic patients.3 When . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joshua J. Fenton, MD
Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program
Department of Family Medicine
University of Washington
Seattle



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Screening for Coronary Calcification
Eduardo Sabaté and Derek Yach
JAMA. 2003;290(12):1576.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Coronary Calcification—Reply
Patrick G. O'Malley and Allen J. Taylor
JAMA. 2003;290(12):1577.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Electron Beam Tomography, With or Without Case Management, on Motivation, Behavioral Change, and Cardiovascular Risk Profile: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Patrick G. O'Malley, Irwin M. Feuerstein, and Allen J. Taylor
JAMA. 2003;289(17):2215-2223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.