 |
 |

Screening for Coronary Calcification
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr O'Malley and colleagues1 found that receipt of a screening "heart scan" provided neither benefit nor harm to a young, predominantly male military population at low 10-year risk of incident coronary heart disease (CHD).
Nevertheless, I remain concerned about the potential harms of computed tomography (CT) screening for CHD among older populations, particularly when undertaken outside of the context of research protocols. A visual diagnosis of silent CHD could have adverse mental health consequences in older patients who seek testing to allay fears of myocardial infarction and sudden death.
Moreover, outside of research protocols, follow-up evaluation of older individuals will frequently devolve to physicians with little experience interpreting calcium scores. Unaware of the high prevalence of coronary calcium in older populations,2 many physicians may refer older patients with detectable coronary calcium for stress testing, which would likely have a low positive predictive value in asymptomatic patients.3 When . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Joshua J. Fenton, MD
Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program Department of Family Medicine University of Washington Seattle
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Screening for Coronary Calcification
Eduardo Sabaté and Derek Yach
JAMA. 2003;290(12):1576.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening for Coronary CalcificationReply
Patrick G. O'Malley and Allen J. Taylor
JAMA. 2003;290(12):1577.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of Electron Beam Tomography, With or Without Case Management, on Motivation, Behavioral Change, and Cardiovascular Risk Profile: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Patrick G. O'Malley, Irwin M. Feuerstein, and Allen J. Taylor
JAMA. 2003;289(17):2215-2223.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|