You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 14, October 8, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Radiography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Jarvik and colleagues1 found that among patients with lumbar pain, those who had plain radiographs had similar outcomes as those who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). I am uncertain of the logic of this trial because plain radiography and MRI are diagnostic tests, but the outcome measure was functional disability. Diagnostic tests should be contrasted for their ability to render accurate diagnoses.

How physicians handle those diagnoses is a separate question. Whether treatment based on the diagnoses improves outcome (such as functional disability) is another important but different question.

Accurate diagnosis allows physicians to rule out other possible etiologies and to give a prognosis. Knowledge of the disease allows clinicians to choose treatments that might work even when they have not been well studied or shown to be effective. Unfortunately, accurate diagnosis does not always lead to improved outcomes, but that does not mean that such . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Louis R. Caplan, MD
Division of General Neurology
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Mass



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain
Edzard Ernst
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1852.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain
Lissy Jarvik
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1852.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain—Reply
Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Richard A. Deyo, and William Hollingworth
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1852-1853.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain—Reply
Nortin M. Hadler
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1853.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rapid Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs Radiographs for Patients With Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Jeffrey G. Jarvik, William Hollingworth, Brook Martin, Scott S. Emerson, Darryl T. Gray, Steven Overman, David Robinson, Thomas Staiger, Frank Wessbecher, Sean D. Sullivan, William Kreuter, and Richard A. Deyo
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2810-2818.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

MRI for Regional Back Pain: Need for Less Imaging, Better Understanding
Nortin M. Hadler
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2863-2865.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.