You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 14, October 8, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Radiography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 94 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Jarvik and colleagues1 found that simple radiographs and rapid MRI yielded similar outcome for patients with back pain. Similarly, Kendrick et al2 previously reported that patients who had radiographs had outcomes similar to those of patients who had no imaging at all. Taken together, these 2 studies suggest that neither radiographs nor MRIs are useful as routine diagnostic procedures for back pain. Comparing one useless diagnostic procedure with a similarly useless one distracts from the fact that, in most cases of back pain, no imaging is best and least expensive.

Edzard Ernst, MD, PhD, FRCP(Edin)
Complementary Medicine
Peninsula Medical School
University of Exeter
Exeter, England

1. Jarvik JG, Hollingworth W, Martin B, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2810-2818. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Kendrick D, Fielding K, Bentley E, Kerslake R, Miller P, Pringle M. Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2001;322:400-405. FREE FULL TEXT

Letters Section Editor: Stephen J. Lurie, MD, PhD, Senior Editor.

JAMA. 2003;290:1852.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain
Louis R. Caplan
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1851-1852.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain
Lissy Jarvik
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1852.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain—Reply
Jeffrey G. Jarvik, Richard A. Deyo, and William Hollingworth
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1852-1853.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Value of Diagnostic Tests for Low Back Pain—Reply
Nortin M. Hadler
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1853.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

MRI for Regional Back Pain: Need for Less Imaging, Better Understanding
Nortin M. Hadler
JAMA. 2003;289(21):2863-2865.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.