You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 14, October 8, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Looking for Medical Injuries Where the Light Is Bright

Saul N. Weingart, MD, PhD; Lisa I. Iezzoni, MD, MSc

JAMA. 2003;290:1917-1919.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Health care quality improvement experts often argue that "you can't manage what you can't measure." Suitable yardsticks are essential to judge the magnitude of potential quality problems and track whether interventions improve care. However, this aphorism needs one critical addendum: "You can't measure what you can't define."

Measurement and definitional issues loom large when discussing patient safety. The bellwether 1999 Institute of Medicine report To Err Is Human provided compelling evidence that medical errors pose daily risks throughout the US health care system but failed to quash controversy about the magnitude of that risk.1 The best-known estimates of the extent of medical error rely on extrapolations from medical record review studies,2-3 although these numbers have generated heated debate.4-6

Delineating definitions, though, should precede measurement. Another Institute of Medicine report defined safety as "avoiding injuries to patients from the care that . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Excess Length of Stay, Charges, and Mortality Attributable to Medical Injuries During Hospitalization
Chunliu Zhan and Marlene R. Miller
JAMA. 2003;290(14):1868-1874.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Liability Reform Should Make Patients Safer: "Avoidable Classes of Events" are a Key Improvement
Bovbjerg and Tancredi
J Law Med Ethics 2005;33:478-500.
 

Medical Device-Associated Safety and Risk: Surveillance and Stratagems
Small
JAMA 2004;291:367-370.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.