 |
 |

Cost-effectiveness of Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic hepatitis C infection, Dr Salomon and colleagues1 pointed out that their findings are highly sensitive to alternative assumptions of the effect of both chronic HCV infection and treatment on quality of life.1 The importance of quality-of-life parameters to their models is largely due to the small proportion of their baseline cohort40-year-old patients with chronic HCV infectionthat is estimated to progress to advanced liver disease-related complications.
We have recently reported a systematic review of studies of the natural history of HCV infection,2 as well as a model of its natural history.3 These analyses suggest an even slower disease progression than Salomon et al used in their analyses. Based on our models, 12% of people with chronic HCV infection and no hepatic fibrosis would progress to cirrhosis after 30 years, nearly half the 20% estimate of Salomon et al. . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Gregory J. Dore, MD, MPH, PhD;
Hla-Hla Thein, MD, MPH
Viral Hepatitis Program National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Cost-effectiveness of Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection
David Bernstein
JAMA. 2003;290(15):1993.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cost-effectiveness of Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C InfectionReply
Joshua A. Salomon and Sue J. Goldie
JAMA. 2003;290(15):1994.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cost-effectiveness of Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in an Evolving Patient Population
Joshua A. Salomon, Milton C. Weinstein, James K. Hammitt, and Sue J. Goldie
JAMA. 2003;290(2):228-237.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|