 |
 |

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Schoen and colleagues1 acknowledged that some of the "new" lesions discovered at 3 years were found because of increased depth of insertion or better bowel preparation at the second examination. Data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Study2 suggest that if a greater amount of the colon is examined at sigmoidoscopy, the yield can be improved. In the VA study,2 we performed screening colonoscopy in 3121 asymptomatic persons, aged 50 to 75 years. We reported differences in sigmoidoscopy yield based on extent reached, and found that 188 of 3121 patients (6.0%) had advanced neoplasia or cancer in the rectum and sigmoid colon. When the examination reached the splenic flexure, 228 patients (7.3%) were found to have distal advanced neoplasia. Overall, 329 patients (10.5%) had at least 1 advanced lesion in the colon. These data suggest that if more colon is examined at sigmoidoscopy, more advanced pathology . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Amnon Sonnenberg, MD, Msc
Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center Portland, Ore
David Lieberman, MD
Division of Gastroenterology Oregon Health & Science University Portland
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Ishay Lev, Amnon Lahad, and Ariae Ben-Yehuda
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Richard C. Wender
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening SigmoidoscopyReply
Robert E. Schoen and Joel L. Weissfeld
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Results of Repeat Sigmoidoscopy 3 Years After a Negative Examination
Robert E. Schoen, Paul F. Pinsky, Joel L. Weissfeld, Robert S. Bresalier, Timothy Church, Philip Prorok, and John K. Gohagan
JAMA. 2003;290(1):41-48.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|