You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 16, October 22, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Schoen and colleagues1 acknowledged that some of the "new" lesions discovered at 3 years were found because of increased depth of insertion or better bowel preparation at the second examination. Data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) Cooperative Study2 suggest that if a greater amount of the colon is examined at sigmoidoscopy, the yield can be improved. In the VA study,2 we performed screening colonoscopy in 3121 asymptomatic persons, aged 50 to 75 years. We reported differences in sigmoidoscopy yield based on extent reached, and found that 188 of 3121 patients (6.0%) had advanced neoplasia or cancer in the rectum and sigmoid colon. When the examination reached the splenic flexure, 228 patients (7.3%) were found to have distal advanced neoplasia. Overall, 329 patients (10.5%) had at least 1 advanced lesion in the colon. These data suggest that if more colon is examined at sigmoidoscopy, more advanced pathology . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Amnon Sonnenberg, MD, Msc
Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Portland, Ore

David Lieberman, MD
Division of Gastroenterology
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Ishay Lev, Amnon Lahad, and Ariae Ben-Yehuda
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Richard C. Wender
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy—Reply
Robert E. Schoen and Joel L. Weissfeld
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Repeat Sigmoidoscopy 3 Years After a Negative Examination
Robert E. Schoen, Paul F. Pinsky, Joel L. Weissfeld, Robert S. Bresalier, Timothy Church, Philip Prorok, and John K. Gohagan
JAMA. 2003;290(1):41-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.