You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 16, October 22, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The study by Dr Schoen and colleagues1 suggests that important opportunities to prevent colon cancer may be missed with a 3-year flexible sigmoidoscopy interval, let alone with the 5-year interval recommended by most guidelines. These data, however, do not necessarily apply to colonoscopy, a test that is done with sedation and a more complete bowel preparation.

This study does, however, lend weight to the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guidelines, which recommend that the combination of an annual fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years is preferred over either test alone.2 Clinical trials of FOBT screening have found that mortality rates from colorectal cancer may be reduced by 33% and that incidence may be reduced by approximately 20%.3-4 The test characteristics of fecal immunochemical tests for occult blood may further improve the usefulness of screening with stool tests.2, 5

The annual FOBT remains . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Richard C. Wender, MD
Department of Family Medicine
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pa



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Ishay Lev, Amnon Lahad, and Ariae Ben-Yehuda
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Amnon Sonnenberg and David Lieberman
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122-2123.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy—Reply
Robert E. Schoen and Joel L. Weissfeld
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Repeat Sigmoidoscopy 3 Years After a Negative Examination
Robert E. Schoen, Paul F. Pinsky, Joel L. Weissfeld, Robert S. Bresalier, Timothy Church, Philip Prorok, and John K. Gohagan
JAMA. 2003;290(1):41-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.