 |
 |

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The study by Dr Schoen and colleagues1 suggests that important opportunities to prevent colon cancer may be missed with a 3-year flexible sigmoidoscopy interval, let alone with the 5-year interval recommended by most guidelines. These data, however, do not necessarily apply to colonoscopy, a test that is done with sedation and a more complete bowel preparation.
This study does, however, lend weight to the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guidelines, which recommend that the combination of an annual fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years is preferred over either test alone.2 Clinical trials of FOBT screening have found that mortality rates from colorectal cancer may be reduced by 33% and that incidence may be reduced by approximately 20%.3-4 The test characteristics of fecal immunochemical tests for occult blood may further improve the usefulness of screening with stool tests.2, 5
The annual FOBT remains . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Richard C. Wender, MD
Department of Family Medicine Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia, Pa
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Ishay Lev, Amnon Lahad, and Ariae Ben-Yehuda
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Amnon Sonnenberg and David Lieberman
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122-2123.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening SigmoidoscopyReply
Robert E. Schoen and Joel L. Weissfeld
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Results of Repeat Sigmoidoscopy 3 Years After a Negative Examination
Robert E. Schoen, Paul F. Pinsky, Joel L. Weissfeld, Robert S. Bresalier, Timothy Church, Philip Prorok, and John K. Gohagan
JAMA. 2003;290(1):41-48.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|