 |
 |

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening SigmoidoscopyReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Dr Lev and colleagues raise concerns about perforations induced by screening. We have previously argued, however, that the study they cite overstates the incidence of perforation with screening sigmoidoscopy by 30- to 50-fold.1 Nonetheless, improved diagnostic yields from more frequent screening must be weighed against the increased risk of complication.2 Our study was a randomized, community based study of screening for cancer. As in any study based on voluntary enrollment, participants do not exactly match the general population from which they are drawn. But by virtue of our study's geographic diversity and size, findings and conclusions from the study well represent the consequences and impact of screening in the population. Lack of compliance with screening or follow-up of suspicious lesions are inevitable and expected, and mirror the process in the clinical setting. Futhermore, inadequate follow-up underestimates the rate of cancer and diagnosis of advanced adenoma.
Drs Sonnenberg and . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Robert E. Schoen, MD, MPH;
Joel L. Weissfeld, MD, MPH
Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pa
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Ishay Lev, Amnon Lahad, and Ariae Ben-Yehuda
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Amnon Sonnenberg and David Lieberman
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122-2123.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Richard C. Wender
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening Sigmoidoscopy How Often and How Good?
Robert H. Fletcher
JAMA. 2003;290(1):106-108.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|