You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 16, October 22, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Lev and colleagues raise concerns about perforations induced by screening. We have previously argued, however, that the study they cite overstates the incidence of perforation with screening sigmoidoscopy by 30- to 50-fold.1 Nonetheless, improved diagnostic yields from more frequent screening must be weighed against the increased risk of complication.2 Our study was a randomized, community based study of screening for cancer. As in any study based on voluntary enrollment, participants do not exactly match the general population from which they are drawn. But by virtue of our study's geographic diversity and size, findings and conclusions from the study well represent the consequences and impact of screening in the population. Lack of compliance with screening or follow-up of suspicious lesions are inevitable and expected, and mirror the process in the clinical setting. Futhermore, inadequate follow-up underestimates the rate of cancer and diagnosis of advanced adenoma.

Drs Sonnenberg and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Robert E. Schoen, MD, MPH; Joel L. Weissfeld, MD, MPH
Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Ishay Lev, Amnon Lahad, and Ariae Ben-Yehuda
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Amnon Sonnenberg and David Lieberman
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2122-2123.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Intervals and Techniques for Screening Sigmoidoscopy
Richard C. Wender
JAMA. 2003;290(16):2123.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening Sigmoidoscopy— How Often and How Good?
Robert H. Fletcher
JAMA. 2003;290(1):106-108.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.