You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 21, December 3, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Proposals for US National Health Insurance—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Palmisano incorrectly equates our proposed NHI with Canada's. The United States spends 75% more per capita on health care than Canada and 145% more than Britain1; our higher spending would (and should) persist under NHI. Underfunding in Canada has caused some waits and shortages, which have been exaggerated in the US press.2 Nonetheless, levels of satisfaction with the Canadian health care system are similar to those in the United States.1, 3 We believe that Canada spends too little on health care, but gets great value for money. While Canadians appropriately criticize their system, they overwhelmingly support it.4

Palmisano views the perpetuation of private insurance firms as essential to freedom. We disagree. An NHI program would regulate publicly funded hospital expansion, not prohibit it. His assertion that NHI would amplify intrusive bureaucracy is puzzling; US health maintenance organizations (HMOs) are world champions at hassling physicians.3 The research literature . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPH; David U. Himmelstein, MD; Marcial Angell, MD; Quentin D. Young, MD for the Physicians' Working Group for Single-Payer National Health Insurance



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Donald J. Palmisano
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2797.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Michael Patmas
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2797-2798.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
J. Timothy Ames
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2798.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Constantine L. Hampers
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2798.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Indira Jevaji
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2798.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Vic Velanovich
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2798-2799.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proposals for US National Health Insurance
Elizabeth A. Bayliss
JAMA. 2003;290(21):2799.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Mortality Between Private For-Profit and Private Not-For-Profit Hemodialysis Centers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
P. J. Devereaux, Holger J. Schünemann, Nikila Ravindran, Mohit Bhandari, Amit X. Garg, Peter T.-L. Choi, Brydon J. B. Grant, Ted Haines, Christina Lacchetti, Bruce Weaver, John N. Lavis, Deborah J. Cook, David R. S. Haslam, Terrence Sullivan, and Gordon H. Guyatt
JAMA. 2002;288(19):2449-2457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.