You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 21, December 3, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Internists' Adherence to Guidelines for Prevention of Intravascular Catheter Infections

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editors: Catheter-related bloodstream infections associated with the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) are a major source of morbidity in US intensive care units,1 accounting for approximately 80 000 infections annually. To prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections, national evidence-based guidelines published in 1996 recommended maximal barrier precautions (MBPs) (ie, mask, sterile gloves, gown, and large sterile drape) and skin antisepsis during CVC insertion.2 In 2001, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality supported an evidence-based review of best hospital safety practices, listing MBPs among the highest priorities.3 The 2002 update of national guidelines prioritized MBP use and skin antisepsis with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG),4 but physician adherence to recommendations supporting use of MBPs and CHG remains unknown.

Methods

Surveys were mailed to 1000 US internists selected randomly from the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine membership. Initial surveys were mailed in June 2002, followed by up to 2 additional . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Lewis Rubinson, MD; Edward F. Haponik, MD
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine

Albert W. Wu, MD, MPH
Division of General Internal Medicine

Gregory B. Diette, MD, MHS
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Md



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Prevention Practices by US Hospitals
Krein et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:672-678.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.