You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 5, August 6, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Viral Infections
 •Public Health, Other
 •Violence and Human Rights
 •Bioterrorism
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Accuracy of a Local Surveillance System for Early Detection of Emerging Infectious Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Syndromic surveillance, based on analysis of clinical or administrative data to detect patterns consistent with emerging diseases, could allow for early recognition of attacks with biological or chemical weapons. Since the 2001 terror attacks, many institutions, encouraged by public health authorities and accreditation agencies, have sought to develop their own surveillance systems. However, the sensitivity and specificity of such single-institution systems have not been validated.

Methods

The emergence of West Nile Virus (WNV) as a widespread cause of neurological disease during the summer of 2002 offered a unique opportunity to test the performance of single-institution syndromic surveillance. Between August and October of 2002, more than 700 WNV cases were reported in the state of Illinois, of which more than 500 were in the Chicago area.1

We reviewed monthly International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding data for July 1998 through October 2002 to determine whether the . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.