You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 290 No. 6, August 13, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Medical News & Perspectives
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

In-Office Opiate Treatment "Not a Panacea"

Physicians Slow to Embrace Therapeutic Option

Brian Vastag

JAMA. 2003;290:731-735.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

A drug trumpeted as a major advance in opiate addiction treatment is garnering a tepid response from physicians, despite its status as the first such treatment available outside licensed drug treatment clinics. Bureaucratic hurdles, lack of clinical guidelines, and unfamiliarity with addiction have all hampered physician adoption of the drug, buprenorphine.

While less strictly regulated than methadone, buprenorphine can be prescribed only by physicians who complete an eight-hour course and register with the Department of Health and Human Services and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

But even after receiving a special DEA number, individual physicians and physician group practices—no matter how large—are limited by law to 30 buprenorphine patients, a figure several people interviewed for this article called absurd.


"That [limit] is going to have to change before there's widespread use," said Michael G. Hayes, MD, director of the Center for Addiction Medicine, part of the University of . . . [Full Text of this Article]



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Equity In Private Insurance Coverage For Substance Abuse: A Perspective On Parity
Barry and Sindelar
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w706-w716.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.