 |
 |

Isometric Training to Treat Chronic Neck Pain
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Ylinen and colleagues1 found that both strength (isometric) and endurance (isotonic) training were superior to a control regimen of stretching and aerobic exercise for relieving chronic neck pain. The authors also found that isometric training improved strength more than did isotonic training.
I have 3 concerns about this study. First, isometric training is most specifically designed to increase the isometric strength of particular muscles.2 Thus, use of isometric strength as an outcome measure could result in significant bias in favor of the isometric group.
Second, there were other important differences between the experimental and control groups that may explain these results. Both isometric and isotonic groups received 9 practice sessions "to enable them to learn the program properly" whereas the control group was trained only once in the proper way to perform the exercise and subsequently received written instruction. Because the participants in the control group . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Scott F. Nadler, DO
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNew Jersey Medical School Newark
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Isometric Training to Treat Chronic Neck PainReply
Jari Ylinen
JAMA. 2003;290(8):1027-1028.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Active Neck Muscle Training in the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Jari Ylinen, Esa-Pekka Takala, Matti Nykänen, Arja Häkkinen, Esko Mälkiä, Timo Pohjolainen, Sirkka-Liisa Karppi, Hannu Kautiainen, and Olavi Airaksinen
JAMA. 2003;289(19):2509-2516.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|