You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 1, January 7, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Complex World of Prescribing Behavior

C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil

JAMA. 2004;291:104-106.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Better decision making by physicians could materially improve the balance of benefits and harms in health care while saving billions of dollars. It is therefore little wonder that academics, policy makers, third-party payers, and leaders of the profession alike have been grappling for many years with the challenge of modifying physician behaviors.

Conventional wisdom on that issue has arguably evolved through 4 phases.1 The Era of Optimism featured a belief that physicians could be transformed into critical appraisal machines, tirelessly combing the peer-reviewed literature and consistently translating the best evidence about drugs and devices into action. The Era of Innocence Lost and Regained saw a loss of faith in passive diffusion of evidence and its distillation by individual clinicians. Instead, the medical establishment fervently embraced active dissemination and collective synthesis of evidence in the form of meta-analyses, decision analyses, and practice guidelines. The Era of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Office of the Dean, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.


RELATED ARTICLES

Changes in Prescribing Patterns Following Publication of the ALLHAT Trial
Peter C. Austin, Muhammad M. Mamdani, Karen Tu, and Merrick Zwarenstein
JAMA. 2004;291(1):44-45.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: Annual Trends and Response to Recent Evidence
Adam L. Hersh, Marcia L. Stefanick, and Randall S. Stafford
JAMA. 2004;291(1):47-53.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Clinical Trial Results on National Trends in {alpha}-Blocker Prescribing, 1996-2002
Randall S. Stafford, Curt D. Furberg, Stan N. Finkelstein, Iain M. Cockburn, Tseday Alehegn, and Jun Ma
JAMA. 2004;291(1):54-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Fish in Secondary Prevention of Heart Disease (FISH) Survey--Primary Care Physicians and {omega}3 Fatty Acid Prescribing Behaviors
Oh et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:459-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Promotion and Prescribing of Hormone Therapy After Report of Harm by the Women's Health Initiative
Majumdar et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1983-1988.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Minding the gap: can continuing medical education bridge the quality chasm?
Barnes
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:199-200.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.