You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 1, January 7, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Magnets for Patients With Heel Pain—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: In response to Dr Weintraub, plantar fasciitis is a clinical diagnosis, not a laboratory diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging, radiographs, and nerve conduction studies have not been validated in the literature as being diagnostic for plantar fasciitis and they are not used routinely as such in clinical practice.

In contrast with Weintraub's claims, our study did not limit "magnetic application" to only 4 hours per day, 4 days per week. Rather, the protocol suggested this as minimum use. Daily diary responses indicated that the participants typically used the insoles 6 to 7 days per week for 9 to 10 hours per day.

The consideration of magnet placement within the insole is a valid concern, although one of uncertain clinical significance. There would have been some variability between participants as to the physical proximity of the magnetic foil to the plantar fascia. However, there was also likely some variability between . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Mark H. Winemiller, MD; Edward R. Laskowski, MD
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Rochester, Minn



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Magnets for Patients With Heel Pain
Michael I. Weintraub
JAMA. 2004;291(1):43-44.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Magnetic vs Sham-Magnetic Insoles on Plantar Heel Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Mark H. Winemiller, Robert G. Billow, Edward R. Laskowski, and W. Scott Harmsen
JAMA. 2003;290(11):1474-1478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Getting clinical trial results into practice: design, implementation, and process evaluation of the ALLHAT Dissemination Project
Bartholomew et al.
Clin Trials 2009;6:329-343.
ABSTRACT  

Comparative effectiveness research: Relevance and applications to pharmacy
Schumock and Pickard
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009;66:1278-1286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beyond the Randomized Clinical Trial: The Role of Effectiveness Studies in Evaluating Cardiovascular Therapies
Nallamothu et al.
Circulation 2008;118:1294-1303.
FULL TEXT  

Changes in Antihypertensive Prescribing During US Outpatient Visits for Uncomplicated Hypertension Between 1993 and 2004
Ma et al.
Hypertension 2006;48:846-852.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Many "Me-Too" Drugs Are Enough? The Case of Physician Preferences for Specific Statins
Austin et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:1047-1051.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.