You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 1, January 7, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Changes in Prescribing Patterns Following Publication of the ALLHAT Trial

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Antihypertensive agents are among the most commonly prescribed medications for elderly persons in North America.1 The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), published on December 18, 2002, concluded that thiazide-type diuretics should be the first-step antihypertensive therapy, compared with either calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.2 We examined trends in incident use of antihypertensive agents following publication of the ALLHAT trial.

Methods

We studied claims for antihypertensive agents that were submitted to the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) program between January 1, 1992, and April 30, 2003. The ODB program tracks prescriptions dispensed to all 1.3 million residents of Ontario older than 65 years. We examined claims for the following classes of antihypertensive agents: thiazide-type diuretics, CCBs, {beta}-blockers, and ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. For each month of each year, we determined the number of prescriptions filled by patients who had . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Peter C. Austin, PhD; Muhammad M. Mamdani, PharmD, MA, MPH; Karen Tu, MD, MSc, CCFP; Merrick Zwarenstein, MB, BCh, MSc(Med), MSc
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Toronto, Ontario


RELATED ARTICLE

The Complex World of Prescribing Behavior
C. David Naylor
JAMA. 2004;291(1):104-106.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The choice of antihypertensive therapy in patients with the metabolic syndrome--time to change recommendations?
Hilgers and Mann
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;0:gfn455v1-gfn455.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 22/Reversal of Atherosclerosis With Aggressive Lipid Lowering Trials on Trends in Intensive Versus Moderate Statin Therapy in Ontario, Canada
Austin and Mamdani
Circulation 2005;112:1296-1300.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Complex World of Prescribing Behavior
Naylor
JAMA 2004;291:104-106.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.