 |
 |

Parenteral vs Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative PainReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: In response to Drs Jankowski and Warner, a statistically significant difference is more likley to be obtained when analyzing larger numbers of patients. In our case, the overall difference between opioid and epidural analgesia represented an approximate 30% difference. When assessed over the entire range (10%-75%) and compared with patient-derived measures of clinically important differences, an approximate 33% reduction in pain intensity appears to be the optimal and clinically meaningful cutoff.1-2 In addition, another article published after ours also suggested that an approximately 35% decrease in acute pain scores is clinically meaningful.3 As more studies are published, an updated analysis comparing the 2 regimens would be appropriate.
We agree that extremely aggressive pain management might diminish the differences in pain scores between parenteral opioids and epidural analgesia. This might be especially true for PCA. In fact, aggressive pain management has been reported to result in similar pain scores . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Christopher L. Wu, MD
chwu@jhmi.edu
Brian M. Block, MD, PhD;
Andrew J. Rowlingson, BA
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Md
Spencer S. Liu, MD
Department of Anesthesiology Virginia Mason Medical Center University of Washington Seattle
Anne R. Cowan, MD
Department of Anesthesiology
John A. Cowan, MD
Department of Neurosurgery University of Michigan Ann Arbor
RELATED ARTICLES
Parenteral vs Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain
Christopher J. Jankowski and David O. Warner
JAMA. 2004;291(10):1197-1198.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Efficacy of Postoperative Epidural Analgesia: A Meta-analysis
Brian M. Block, Spencer S. Liu, Andrew J. Rowlingson, Anne R. Cowan, John A. Cowan, Jr, and Christopher L. Wu
JAMA. 2003;290(18):2455-2463.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|