You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 10, March 10, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Tobacco
 •Public Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Immediate vs the Important

J. Michael McGinnis, MD, MPP; William H. Foege, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2004;291:1263-1264.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

When Hippocrates observed that "protecting and developing health must rank even above that of restoring it when it is impaired,"1 he set a standard that is difficult to meet. One of the most difficult challenges is to ensure that the urgent does not crowd out the important. In health, this challenge is especially difficult because urgent matters can be so riveting. At the personal level, the presence of illness or injury often overpowers all other concerns, and the search for effective treatment often dominates all other pursuits. At the policy level, with 15% of the US gross domestic product devoted to health care,2 medical care expenditures often drive decisions in which cost cutting is aimed first at discretionary investments, such as those in prevention and public health that offer the greatest prospects for overall health improvement. Hence, tools are needed . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ (Dr McGinnis) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Wash (Dr Foege).


RELATED ARTICLE

Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000
Ali H. Mokdad, James S. Marks, Donna F. Stroup, and Julie L. Gerberding
JAMA. 2004;291(10):1238-1245.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vision for a Global Registry of Anticipated Public Health Studies
Choi et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:S82-S87.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Making the Case for DOCNEWS
Hirsch
DOC News 2004;1:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Modifiable Behavioral Factors as Causes of Death
Blair et al.
JAMA 2004;291:2942-2942.
FULL TEXT  

If it bleeds, it leads: the pathos derby
Shatenstein
Tobacco Control 2004;13:97-99.
FULL TEXT  

The Real Leading Killers in the U.S.
Journal Watch Cardiology 2004;2004:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.