You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 11, March 17, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prehospital Care of the Multiply Injured Patient

The Challenge of Figuring Out What Works

Roger J. Lewis, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2004;291:1382-1384.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of THE JOURNAL, Cooper and colleagues1 report the results of a well-designed and well-executed randomized trial comparing 2 fluid resuscitation strategies in the initial prehospital treatment of adults with severe traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic hypotension. Although the results show no evidence of improved neurological outcome with the hypertonic saline (HTS)–based resuscitation strategy, the study is noteworthy for several reasons. First, it is one of relatively few examples of double-blind, randomized controlled studies of therapies for critically ill patients conducted in the prehospital setting.2-3 Such studies are critically important to determine what works in that setting. Second, the study illustrates several issues regarding obtaining informed consent for participation in research from acutely incapacitated patients in the prehospital setting. Third, the study results, although negative, may be helpful in guiding choices of fluid resuscitation strategies in future investigations.

Determining whether a therapy works . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Prehospital Hypertonic Saline Resuscitation of Patients With Hypotension and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial
D. James Cooper, Paul S. Myles, Francis T. McDermott, Lynette J. Murray, John Laidlaw, Gregory Cooper, Ann B. Tremayne, Stephen S. Bernard, and Jennie Ponsford
JAMA. 2004;291(11):1350-1357.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity
Stiell et al.
CMAJ 2008;178:1141-1152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.