 |
 |

Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Proteinuria
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Boulware and colleagues1 concluded that a strategy of annual dipstick screening for proteinuria with follow-up testing and treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor would not be cost-effective to slow progression of kidney disease or to decrease mortality. We believe that their results were strongly influenced by a number of factors, including the low yield of the screening test, the high costs for the screening by the primary care physician, and the possible added reduction of cardiovascular morbidity that is not taken into account.
Based on our data2 we think that screening for microalbuminuria would be more rational than screening for proteinuria. Among a primary prevention population, urinary albumin excretion of 0.3 g/dL or higher per 24 hours has been reported to be predictive for later occurrence of cardiovascular disease.2-3 Retrospective subgroup analyses of a recent large-scale randomized controlled trial found that treatment with ACE inhibitors . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Ron T. Gansevoort, PhD;
Paul E. de Jong, PhD
Department of Medicine
Maarten J. Postma, PhD
Department of Pharmaco-Epidemiology University Hospital Groningen Groningen, the Netherlands
RELATED ARTICLES
Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Proteinuria
Ron T. Gansevoort, Paul E. de Jong, and Maarten J. Postma
JAMA. 2004;291(12):1442-1443.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cost-effectiveness of Screening for ProteinuriaReply
L. Ebony Boulware, Bernard G. Jaar, and Neil R. Powe
JAMA. 2004;291(12):1443.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Pharmacoeconomics in nephrology: considerations on cost-effectiveness of screening for albuminuria
Postma et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:1103-1106.
FULL TEXT
Screening, Monitoring, and Treatment of Albuminuria: Public Health Perspectives
de Jong and Curhan
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;17:2120-2126.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|