You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 12, March 24/31, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Renal Diseases
 •Renal Diseases, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Proteinuria

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Boulware and colleagues1 concluded that a strategy of annual dipstick screening for proteinuria with follow-up testing and treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor would not be cost-effective to slow progression of kidney disease or to decrease mortality. We believe that their results were strongly influenced by a number of factors, including the low yield of the screening test, the high costs for the screening by the primary care physician, and the possible added reduction of cardiovascular morbidity that is not taken into account.

Based on our data2 we think that screening for microalbuminuria would be more rational than screening for proteinuria. Among a primary prevention population, urinary albumin excretion of 0.3 g/dL or higher per 24 hours has been reported to be predictive for later occurrence of cardiovascular disease.2-3 Retrospective subgroup analyses of a recent large-scale randomized controlled trial found that treatment with ACE inhibitors . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Ron T. Gansevoort, PhD; Paul E. de Jong, PhD
Department of Medicine

Maarten J. Postma, PhD
Department of Pharmaco-Epidemiology
University Hospital Groningen
Groningen, the Netherlands


RELATED ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Proteinuria
Ron T. Gansevoort, Paul E. de Jong, and Maarten J. Postma
JAMA. 2004;291(12):1442-1443.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Proteinuria—Reply
L. Ebony Boulware, Bernard G. Jaar, and Neil R. Powe
JAMA. 2004;291(12):1443.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pharmacoeconomics in nephrology: considerations on cost-effectiveness of screening for albuminuria
Postma et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:1103-1106.
FULL TEXT  

Screening, Monitoring, and Treatment of Albuminuria: Public Health Perspectives
de Jong and Curhan
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;17:2120-2126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.