You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 13, April 7, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Research Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Risk of Twinning as a Function of Maternal Height and Body Mass Index

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Rates of twinning declined from the 1950s through the 1970s in many countries1-2 even after controlling for age and parity2 but began to increase again in the 1980s.1 Monozygotic twinning is considered an essentially random event with constant rates around the world, although recent evidence suggests that it may be more likely among women undergoing infertility treatment.1 Changes in twinning rates are thus largely attributable to dizygotic twinning, which is influenced by maternal age, race, family history,1, 3 and, possibly, height and weight.3-4 Widespread use of infertility drugs is presumably the main cause of the recent increase in dizygotic twinning in most industrialized countries.1 We examined the relationship between twinning and maternal height and body mass index (BMI) in a large national cohort.

Methods

We used the Danish National Birth Registry to identify 62 073 singleton and twin births from the 24th gestational week occurring between 1998 and 2001 to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Olga Basso, MD, PhD
ob{at}soci.au.dk

Ellen Aagaard Nohr, MHS
Danish Epidemiology Science Centre
University of Århus
Århus, Denmark

Kaare Christensen, MD, PhD
Epidemiology, Institute of Public Health, and the Danish Twin Registry
University of Southern Denmark
Odense

Jørn Olsen, MD, PhD
Danish Epidemiology Science Centre
University of Århus



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Estimation of the Contribution of Non-Assisted Reproductive Technology Ovulation Stimulation Fertility Treatments to US Singleton and Multiple Births
Schieve et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:1396-1407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why twin pregnancies are more successful at advanced than young maternal age? A potential role of 'terminal reproductive investment'
Helle
Hum Reprod 2008;23:2387-2389.
FULL TEXT  

Dizygotic twinning
Hoekstra et al.
Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:37-47.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Twin pregnancy possibly associated with high semen quality
Asklund et al.
Hum Reprod 2007;22:751-755.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.