You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 14, April 14, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Law and Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Evidence-Based Medicine on Trial

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Unfortunately, the results of Dr Merenstein's trial1 demonstrate that juries, as well as some attorneys, misunderstand EBM, believing that its focus is as a cost-saving method of practice. The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) stands behind its use of EBM in the development of clinical practice guidelines, continuing medical education, and quality improvement. We continue to develop, on our own and with other specialty organizations, clinical practice guidelines that are based on critical evaluation of the current best evidence and that incorporate shared decision making.

Some physicians may respond to high-profile cases such as this one by ordering unnecessary tests and procedures in the belief that if they can adhere to all standards—evidence-based or not—they will prevent malpractice suits. Since each diagnostic or treatment intervention carries its own risk, attempts to practice such "defensive medicine" will over time expose patients to unnecessary injury. Instead, we hope . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Michael Fleming, MD
President, American Academy of Family Physicians
Leawood, Kan


RELATED ARTICLES

Evidence-Based Medicine on Trial
Daphne P. Bicket
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1696.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Medicine on Trial
Richard A. Hogan
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1696-1697.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Medicine on Trial
Leonard J. Morse
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1697.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Medicine on Trial
Clark Watts
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1697.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Medicine on Trial
Mark A. Hall, Michael D. Green, and Arthur Hartz
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1697.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Medicine on Trial—Reply
Daniel Merenstein
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1698.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Winners and Losers
Daniel Merenstein
JAMA. 2004;291(1):15-16.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

How does evidence based guidance influence determinations of medical negligence?
Hurwitz
BMJ 2004;329:1024-1028.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.