You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 15, April 21, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Use of Coronary Calcification Scores to Predict Coronary Heart Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: We have several concerns about the study by Dr Greenland and colleagues.1 First, the authors emphasized the lack of association between the CACS and risk among persons with an FRS less than 10%. In fact, such an interaction would be difficult to detect, and this study adds little evidence, given the low number of persons in the study with an FRS less than 10% (n = 98) and the low number of events in that subgroup (n = 1). Furthermore, measurement of the CACS in this low-risk subgroup is unlikely to be cost-effective.2

Second, the predicted event rates used in the authors' Figure 1 and in the ROC curve analysis are based on a model of linearly increasing risk with increasing CACS (untransformed). This probably leads to systematic underestimation of risk at low scores and overestimation of risk at high scores, as it assumes that risk increases . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Mark J. Pletcher, MD, MPH
mpletcher@epi.ucsf.edu

Jeffrey A. Tice, MD
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
University of California, San Francisco

Michael Pignone, MD, MPH
Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology
School of Medicine
University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill


RELATED ARTICLES

Use of Coronary Calcification Scores to Predict Coronary Heart Disease
Anthony S. Wierzbicki, Patrick J. Twomey, and Timothy M. Reynolds
JAMA. 2004;291(15):1831.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Coronary Calcification Scores to Predict Coronary Heart Disease
Matthew J. Budoff, James Ehrlich, Harvey S. Hecht, and John A. Rumberger
JAMA. 2004;291(15):1832.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Coronary Calcification Scores to Predict Coronary Heart Disease—Reply
Robert C. Detrano, Philip Greenland, Terence M. Doherty, Stanley P. Azen, and Laurie LaBree
JAMA. 2004;291(15):1832-1833.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coronary Artery Calcium Score Combined With Framingham Score for Risk Prediction in Asymptomatic Individuals
Philip Greenland, Laurie LaBree, Stanley P. Azen, Terence M. Doherty, and Robert C. Detrano
JAMA. 2004;291(2):210-215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

PET/CT: Challenge for Nuclear Cardiology
Schwaiger et al.
JNM 2005;46:1664-1678.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.