 |
|
The Public's Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening—Reply
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
In Reply: Drs Shenson and Alderman suggest there is a mismatch between the strong public enthusiasm for cancer screening we reported and a low observed screening rate reported by others. The dismal statistic they cite—"fewer than 12% of US women aged 50 years or older are up to date with recommended preventive services"—is misleading. It refers to the proportion of women up to date on all of 6 preventive services (colorectal, cervical, and breast cancer screening; cholesterol testing; flu and pneumonia vaccinations). In fact, according to year 2000 data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, median compliance with mammography and Papanicolaou testing recommendations were 76% and 87%, respectively, across the 50 States (rates of colorectal cancer were substantially lower, with a median 31% of women 50 and older up to date).1 While we agree that facilitating access to screening for those who want it is an important . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Steven Woloshin, MD, MS;
Lisa M. Schwartz, MD, MS;
H. Gilbert Welch, MD, MPH
VA Outcomes Group
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
White River Junction, VT
RELATED ARTICLES
The Public's Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening
Douglas Shenson and Michael Alderman
JAMA. 2004;291(15):1835.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Public's Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening
Istvan Nyirjesy
JAMA. 2004;291(15):1835-1836.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Public's Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening
Grant Fankhauser
JAMA. 2004;291(15):1836.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enthusiasm for Cancer Screening in the United States
Lisa M. Schwartz, Steven Woloshin, Floyd J. Fowler, Jr, and H. Gilbert Welch
JAMA. 2004;291(1):71-78.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
