You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 16, April 28, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Physiology
 •Surgical Infections
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Pryor and colleagues1 reported that hyperoxia increased the risk of surgical wound infection. In contrast, Greif et al2 reported that hyperoxia decreased the risk. One possible explanation for these discrepant results may relate to the rate of oxygen delivery to the wound itself. In healthy awake volunteers, as well as in anesthetized patients, cardiac output is reduced and systemic vascular resistance increased following the exposure to normobaric hyperoxia.3-4 Oxygen delivery is the product of cardiac index and arterial oxygen content. Increasing the fractional inspired oxygen (FIO2) from 30% to 80% causes a small (0.5%) increase in arterial oxygen saturation, and consequently higher arterial oxygen content; however this was more than counteracted by a decrease (6%) in cardiac index.3

Oxygen delivery may therefore be paradoxically decreased by increasing the FIO2. Thus, it is possible that patients experiencing hyperoxia intraoperatively may have less oxygen delivered to . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Johann Harten, MbChB, MD, FFARCSI; Keith Anderson, MbChB, FRCA; John Kinsella, MBBS, FRCA
Department of Anaesthesia
University of Glasgow
Glasgow, Scotland


RELATED ARTICLES

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Harriet W. Hopf, Thomas K. Hunt, and Noah Rosen
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1956.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Ozan Akça and Daniel I. Sessler
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1956-1957.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Robert Greif and Daniel I. Sessler
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1957.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
James T. Lee
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1957-1958.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Martin J. O'Neill, Jr
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1958.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection—Reply
Kane O. Pryor, Thomas J. Fahey, III, Cynthia A. Lien, and Peter A. Goldstein
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1958-1959.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Site Infection and the Routine Use of Perioperative Hyperoxia in a General Surgical Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kane O. Pryor, Thomas J. Fahey, III, Cynthia A. Lien, and Peter A. Goldstein
JAMA. 2004;291(1):79-87.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Hypercapnia improves tissue oxygenation in morbidly obese surgical patients.
Hager et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2006;103:677-681.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.