You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 16, April 28, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology
 •Surgical Infections
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Pryor and colleagues1 did not measure oxygenation of peri-incisional fatty tissue, which is an important mediator of wound-space oxygenation and the resulting oxygen-dependent killing of bacteria by local neutrophils.2 To isolate a potential effect of increased inspired oxygen on local wound defenses, it is also important to prevent peripheral vasoconstriction, both by volume expansion and also by warming to avoid blunting of reflex vasoconstriction as patients emerge from general anesthesia.3 Unfortunately, Pryor et al did not describe details of fluid management or warming. Furthermore, simple volume expansion may improve fat oxygenation by as much as 25% without administration of extra oxygen.4 Inadequate pain control may also play an important role in stimulating sympathetic discharge; the resultant peripheral vasoconstriction need not be massive to influence fat perfusion and thus oxygenation.5

Finally, patients who received the higher oxygen concentration were more likely to be obese. Such patients may . . . [Full Text of this Article]

James T. Lee, MD, PhD
jtlmd@blackhole.com
Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minn



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Harriet W. Hopf, Thomas K. Hunt, and Noah Rosen
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1956.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Ozan Akça and Daniel I. Sessler
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1956-1957.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Robert Greif and Daniel I. Sessler
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1957.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Johann Harten, Keith Anderson, and John Kinsella
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1957.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
Martin J. O'Neill, Jr
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1958.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supplemental Oxygen and Risk of Surgical Site Infection—Reply
Kane O. Pryor, Thomas J. Fahey, III, Cynthia A. Lien, and Peter A. Goldstein
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1958-1959.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Site Infection and the Routine Use of Perioperative Hyperoxia in a General Surgical Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kane O. Pryor, Thomas J. Fahey, III, Cynthia A. Lien, and Peter A. Goldstein
JAMA. 2004;291(1):79-87.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.