You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 16, April 28, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study of laboratory isolates, Dr Naimi and colleagues1 found that community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) had different clinical, demographic, and microbiological characteristics than health care–associated MRSA. The authors acknowledged that their study was not population-based. Many studies on this topic have not been population-based and the majority have not tried to measure community-associated MRSA prevalence.2 Some have suggested that control of health care–associated MRSA, which Naimi et al found to account for a large majority of MRSA isolates in Minnesota, may be more difficult if MRSA becomes widespread in the community.3 Prevalence studies, preferably population-based, are needed to determine how widespread MRSA is in communities and nations. Available prevalence studies suggest that MRSA is not yet widespread in the United States or Europe.2 In a population-based study of a Native American population, focusing on a significant increase in community MRSA infections in which MRSA was . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Cassandra D. Salgado, MD, MS
salgadoc@mail.ecu.edu
Brody School of Medicine
East Carolina University
Greenville, NC

Barry M. Farr, MD, MSc
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus—Reply
Kathleen LeDell, Timothy Naimi, Scott Fridkin, and Ruth Lynfield
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1961.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Community- and Health Care–Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection
Timothy S. Naimi, Kathleen H. LeDell, Kathryn Como-Sabetti, Stephanie M. Borchardt, David J. Boxrud, Jerome Etienne, Susan K. Johnson, Francois Vandenesch, Scott Fridkin, Carol O'Boyle, Richard N. Danila, and Ruth Lynfield
JAMA. 2003;290(22):2976-2984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Efficacy of Iclaprim against Wild-Type and Thymidine Kinase-Deficient Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in an In Vitro Fibrin Clot Model
Entenza et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3635-3641.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.