 |
 |

Effects of Breast Augmentation on Accuracy of Mammography
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Miglioretti and colleagues1 concluded that breast augmentation decreases the sensitivity but not the specificity of screening mammography. In the absence of information on implant type and placement (ie, subglandular or subpectoral) and prevalence of capsular contracture, however, it is difficult to know how to apply these results. For example, Silverstein et al2 reported that women with subglandular implants had a 49% mean decrease in measurable tissue area using compression mammography and a 39% mean decrease using displacement. Women with submuscular implants had a 28% decrease in measurable tissue with compression mammography as compared with a 9% decrease using displacement.
Silverstein et al3 further found that while there was a decrease in the amount of measurable, visualized breast tissue following augmentation with silicone gelfilled implants, the films obtained were superior when the implant was placed in the subpectoral as opposed to the subglandular position. Severity of capsular . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Deborah J. Steiner, MD, MS
Research Testing Laboratories Inc Great Neck, NY
Robert G. Schwager, MD
New York Hospital/Cornell Medical Center New York, NY
Don J. Lewittes, PhD
New York
RELATED ARTICLES
Effects of Breast Augmentation on Accuracy of MammographyReply
Diana L Miglioretti and Karla Kerlikowske
JAMA. 2004;291(17):2073-2074.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of Breast Augmentation on the Accuracy of Mammography and Cancer Characteristics
Diana L. Miglioretti, Carolyn M. Rutter, Berta M. Geller, Gary Cutter, William E. Barlow, Robert Rosenberg, Donald L. Weaver, Stephen H. Taplin, Rachel Ballard-Barbash, Patricia A. Carney, Bonnie C. Yankaskas, and Karla Kerlikowske
JAMA. 2004;291(4):442-450.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|