You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 17, May 5, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Ethics
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physicians as Citizens

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their Special Communication about physician-citizens, Dr Gruen and colleagues1 proposed that public obligations of physicians should be proportional to 3 criteria: the degree to which proposed actions directly address disease causation, their feasibility to perform, and their efficaciousness. Critical among the factors is the relation of the action to disease causation. Hence, in the authors' view, actions targeting broad socioeconomic conditions that indirectly influence health care are "aspirational goals," but not obligatory. Although the authors provided examples for distinguishing direct and indirect causes of disease, they did not establish specific guidelines. For instance, the authors stated that actions addressing cigarette smoking and needle exchange are direct and obligatory. By contrast, actions to address income disparities or to remove environmental pollutants are indirect, and thus aspirational.

This argument derives from the view that physician's public roles follow directly and exclusively from a "social contract," exchanging professional benefits . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Matthew K. Wynia, MD, MPH
The Institute for Ethics at the American Medical Association
Chicago, Ill

Chalmers C. Clark, PhD
Yale University
New Haven, Conn



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Physicians as Citizens
Douglas L. Weed and Graça M. Dores
JAMA. 2004;291(17):2076.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians as Citizens
Michael T. Compton, Aneel Advani, Joe McLaughlin, Melissa Tobin-D'Angelo, Elizabeth Tong, and Erica Frank
JAMA. 2004;291(17):2076.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians as Citizens—Reply
Russell L. Gruen, Steven D. Pearson, and Troyen A. Brennan
JAMA. 2004;291(17):2076-2077.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician-Citizens—Public Roles and Professional Obligations
Russell L. Gruen, Steven D. Pearson, and Troyen A. Brennan
JAMA. 2004;291(1):94-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.